Why are Architects and
Engineers Re-examining the WTC Collapses?
Richard Gage, AIA
The 6 years
since 9/11/01 has given us the time and space to emerge
from the hypnotic trance of the shocks of these attacks
and to rationally evaluate the existing and new evidence
that has become available.
Architects and Engineers are trained to
design buildings that function well and withstand
potentially destructive forces. However, the three
high-rise buildings at the World Trade Center which
"collapsed" on 9/11 (the Twin Towers plus WTC Building
#7) presented us with a body of evidence (i.e.
controlled demolition) that was clearly outside the
scope of our training and experience.
In addition, the shock that hit us on that date from the
repeated attacks and staggering loss of life has limited
our ability to rationally evaluate what really happened.
We therefore found ourselves relying solely upon the
judgment of outside "experts"... and, quite willing to,
"go along" with the collective myth that has unfolded:
that "the buildings failed structurally due to the
aircraft impacts and resulting fires". After all, we saw
the aircraft slam into the building, the resulting huge
fireball, and the ensuing "collapses".
There is however a growing body of very solid evidence
regarding these "collapses" that has emerged in the last
couple of years - gaining ground even in the mainstream
media. This new evidence casts grave doubt upon the
theories of the 9/11 building collapse "experts" as well
as the official reports by the 9/11 Commission, FEMA,
and NIST.
It lays out a solid convincing case which architects and
engineers will readily see: that the three WTC high-rise
buildings were destroyed by both classic and novel forms
of controlled demolition. You will find the evidence
here in our website as well as at the linked websites.
We hope you will find the courage and take the necessary
time to review each section thoroughly.
After all, if in fact these buildings were
professionally demolished with explosives, and since it
takes months of planning and engineering to place the
explosives, and since these buildings were highly secure
from the likes of terrorists, then we are presented with
a horrible conclusion that we can not deny: that this
entire event could only have been planned and
orchestrated by some element(s) within the U.S.
Government. The questions raised are therefore numerous
and ominous that must be answered in the context of a
truly independent congressional investigation with
subpoena power. We can play a very significant role as
building professionals because we have the necessary
technical credibility that Congress will respond to.
Please join us in calling for a re-investigation.
(http://www.ae911truth.org/info/4)
top^
|
